目次
- 1 Minimalism and Its Implications for Language Acquisition and Learnability
- 1.1 Some General Discussion
- 1.2 Learnability
- 1.3 Conclusion
- 2 Triggers,Minimalism,and Learnability
- 2.1 Some General Remarks
- 2.2 Extensional Approaches to Learnability
- 2.3 Intensional Approaches and Triggering Bootstrapping
- 2.4 EPP-Parametrization
- 3 Universals,Occam’s Razor,and the Strong Minimalist Thesis
- 3.1 Introduction
- 3.2 Evolution and the Form and Functioning of FL
- 3.3 Methodological and Ontological Minimalism
- 3.4 Substantive and Formal Universals
- 3.5 Multiple Spell‐Out
- 3.6 Universals and Minimalism
- 3.7 Mathematical Properties in and out of FL
- 4 How the Reality Can Be Compatible with the Strong Minimalist Thesis:Interfacing,Economy,and Variation
- 4.1 Introduction
- 4.2 Some General Discussion
- 4.3 Interfaces as‘Invasive’Components
- 4.4 Multiple Spell‐Out and the Syntax‐Phonology Interface
- 4.5 Syntax‐Pragmatics Interface(López 2003)
- 4.6 Syntax‐Semantics Interface and Parametric Variation
- 4.7 Reanalysis of Adjunction Structure
- 4.8 Semantics‐Epistemology Association(Minkoff 2003)
- 4.9 Some Remarks on the Cartography Project
- 4.10 Conclusion
- 5 Two Case Studies in Language Acquisition:Evolution,Efficient Computation,and Learnability
- 5.1 Introduction
- 5.2 Some General Discussion
- 5.3 Two Case Studies in Learnability
- 5.4 Four Criteria of a Learnability Theory
- 5.5 Some Related Considerations
- 5.6 Conclusion
- 6 What Language is Made From:Helen Keller,Some UG Residues,and the Strong Minimalist Thesis
- 6.1 Introduction
- 6.2 Some General Discussion from the Perspective of the Framework Adopted So Far
- 6.3 Helen Keller
- 6.4 Symmetry;Asymmetry/Antisymmetry,and Related Matters
- 6.5 Some Preliminary Considerations on the Role of Dimensions
言語学 ランキング
言語学のランキングをご紹介します言語学 ランキング一覧を見る